Week 8 Post 1
Background: The Montgomery Bell Academy (MBA) Tournament is
notorious for being difficult to qualify to. Only the top 16 competitors in the
country are invited. Nobody aside from the tournament staff who send out the
invitations know what the exact metric for qualifying is, however, it is
possible to “hunt” an invite by attending (and succeeding) at high level
tournaments around the country. I qualified as a junior resulting in a 4th
place finish and as I’m writing this post it has been less than 12 hours since
I won it as a senior. This year I asked around with my competitors and some of
the attending coaches about experience level, coaching, and speeches given per
week. Because I believe that communication is a skill and not a talent it is my
hypothesis that the more experience, coaching, and speeches given per week a
competitor has the more successful they will have at the tournament. To measure
this I decided to create a “total experience score” which is calculated by
multiplying years competed, speeches per week, and number of coaching types.
|
Place
|
Name
|
Years competed
|
Coaching
|
Speeches Per Week
|
Total Score
|
|
1
|
Mo Marks
|
4
|
Team, Private
|
7
|
56
|
|
2
|
Brian Zheng
|
6
|
Team, Private
|
2
|
24
|
|
3
|
Anuj Kothari
|
6
|
Team, Private
|
2
|
24
|
|
4
|
Kay Rollins
|
7
|
Team, Private
|
3
|
42
|
|
5
|
Anurima Mummaneni
|
5
|
Team
|
4
|
20
|
|
6
|
Pranav Pattatathunaduvil
|
5
|
Team
|
4
|
20
|
|
7
|
Jack Silvers
|
5
|
Team
|
4
|
20
|
|
8
|
Juliette Reyes
|
6
|
Team, Private
|
4
|
48
|
|
9
|
Angela Wang
|
5
|
Team
|
4
|
20
|
|
10
|
Gustavo Lanz
|
5
|
Team, Private
|
2
|
40
|
|
11
|
Eve Mainster
|
4
|
Team, Private
|
3
|
24
|
|
12
|
Nikitha Kalahasti
|
3
|
Team
|
3
|
9
|
|
13
|
Muktha Darmapurikar
|
2
|
Team, Private
|
4
|
16
|
|
14
|
James Gao
|
3
|
Team
|
3
|
9
|
|
15
|
Steve Asthana
|
3
|
Team
|
2
|
6
|
|
16
|
Alex Massa
|
3
|
Team
|
2
|
6
|
I think that my hypothesis was correct. In general, the
people with the lowest scores are at the bottom and the highest scores are at
the top. All the people on this graph are highly talented, otherwise they
wouldn’t have been able to qualify to this tournament, but it is clearly the
work we do to build our skills which allow us to go from good to great. Not to
mention, many lower level competitors don’t even do a speech per week, the fact
that it is a metric which can be used for this chart already shows that the
people on the chart who were invited to the tournament do the most work and
therefore earn the results they get.
Comments
Post a Comment